Which stage of James Anderson's idealized policy cycle often does not occur?

In the context of James Anderson's idealized policy cycle, policy evaluation is often the stage that does not occur as systematically or thoroughly as one might hope. While the ideal policy cycle presents a structured method through which policy is developed, implemented, and assessed, reality often complicates this process.

One reason why policy evaluation may be overlooked is that it requires rigorous data collection and analysis, along with a commitment to assessing the outcomes of policies that may not align with the interests of stakeholders involved in the initial phases. Additionally, the pressure to produce immediate results and the political implications of evaluating whether a policy has succeeded or failed can lead policymakers to sidestep a comprehensive evaluation stage.

In contrast, other stages like agenda setting, problem identification, and policy formulation typically receive more attention during the policy-making process. They form the foundation for creating solutions to pressing issues, and there is usually a concerted effort to identify and prioritize problems, develop potential policies, and advocate for those solutions. However, once a policy is in place, the focus can shift towards implementation and enforcement, leaving evaluation as a less prioritized step.